<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what is the best water filter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestwaterfilter1.com/what-is-the-best-water-filter-3.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestwaterfilter1.com/what-is-the-best-water-filter-3.htm</link>
	<description>Water Filter Systems -  House Water Filters</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max the Pro</title>
		<link>http://bestwaterfilter1.com/what-is-the-best-water-filter-3.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7030</link>
		<dc:creator>Max the Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestwaterfilter1.com/what-is-the-best-water-filter-3.htm#comment-7030</guid>
		<description>Brita, because PUR fails to remove benzene, THC, and alachor. The only downside of Brita is that removes 92% atrazine, when PUR removes 96% atrazine. Other than that, Brita can remove chlorine, lead, cysts, and lindane better than PUR can. Not only that, but it is also cheaper than PUR.

Hope this helps, and best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brita, because PUR fails to remove benzene, THC, and alachor. The only downside of Brita is that removes 92% atrazine, when PUR removes 96% atrazine. Other than that, Brita can remove chlorine, lead, cysts, and lindane better than PUR can. Not only that, but it is also cheaper than PUR.</p>
<p>Hope this helps, and best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
